Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article

Home > Cricket > PTI > Report


People will pay when truth comes out: Hair

August 24, 2006 18:24 IST

Under-fire Australian umpire Darrell Hair is not unduly bothered by the strong criticism against him in the wake of the ball-tampering controversy, saying a lot of people will pay the price when he comes out with his version of the row.

Expressing his anguish that he was not treated well in his adopted country (England) following Sunday's unpleasant episode, Hair said he would reveal his side of the story only after the issue comes to an end.

"I'll be putting a lot to my side when this is all over. I have been vilified by virtually everybody here and when the truth comes out a lot of people will pay. So, that's all I can say," Hair was quoted as saying by the Independent.

The 53-year-old Lincolnshire-based umpire said people who wanted him out of the ICC Elite panel of umpires would have do something special to achieve their aim.

"If people want to try and force me out of the game it has to be done in some shape or form that I am unaware of, because I am contracted to do a job and I know I am doing it quite well at the moment so far as the ins and outs are concerned," he said.

Hair said he did not have any problem in officiating in matches involving teams from the subcontinent.

"There is no problem with me and the subcontinent. I have umpired quite a lot in the subcontinent over the last couple of years to the best of my ability."

Responding to a question whether his umpiring was under threat after the ball-tampering row, Hair blamed the media for giving unnecessary emphasis on any subject.

"There's a lot of things under threat and you people (the media) are probably responsible for a lot of them."

© Copyright 2006 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.

Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 34




Sub: Pakistan Versus Hair

Hair is right. He was paid to officiate as an umpire and he has performed well as an umpire. All this talk of racialism, Hitlerism ...


Posted by N.SRINIVASAN





Sub: hair was correct in his stance

hair was correct in his stance of declaring the match to england, if pak had objections why did they not raise it when the ball ...


Posted by ravi





Sub: Hair is right

Hair checked the condition of the match ball and it was his joint decision with West Indies umpire Billy Doctrove to award 5 penalty runs. ...


Posted by Sharath





Sub: Sharjah

Every body Knows how the Umpires were managed in India/pakistan matches in Sharjah, there cannot be smoke without fire


Posted by rauol





Sub: All was fair

I am of the opinion that all that was done by hair was within the rule books of the cricket and i really do not ...


Posted by chhatra




Disclaimer


Advertisement






Copyright © 2006 Rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.