Wicket keeper Kamran Akmal, who turned 24 last month, and 23-year-old Mohammed Asif may not be names that are familiar to cricket fans round the world. But these two youngsters, one playing his 21st Test and later named man of the match for his counter-attacking 113 that rescued the hosts from a precarious situation in the first innings, and the other playing only his third Test, emerged the scourge of the visitors in the series-decider.
Akmal has indeed been a thorn in India's flesh since the Pakistan tour of India last year when he rescued his team in the company of Abdul Razzaq, another player who played a key role in the Test here, at Mohali. The duo then resuced Pakistan from certain defeat and the visitors ultimately squared the series 1-1, losing the second Test at Kolkata and winning the third and final one at Bangalore.
This time around too Akmal and Razzaq were the architects of the grand revival of the home team from a disastrous 39 for 6 to 245 in the first essay with their very gutsy and battling stand of 115. Akmal had another important stand of 82 runs with speedster Shoaib Akhtar, who made 45, and these two partnerships took the tourists to a position from which they could fight back and turn the tables on India.
In contrast, the much-vaunted Indian batting line-up, with each of the top five batsmen having represented the country in 70 Tests at least, came a cropper.
India's tour of Pakistan: Complete coverage
The inexperienced Asif bowled in the right areas on the seaming pitch and reaped the rewards. The lanky pacer, who grabbed seven wickets in the match and six of these were top-order stalwarts, had good support from Razzaq and Akhtar who took only three wickets but bowled aggressively and intimidated the batsmen with a liberal dose of short-pitched balls. And when the path became strewn with hurdles the Indian superstars showed feet of clay.
Tell us what you think of Rahul's team!
Apart from Yuvraj Singh to a large extent -- with a 45 in the first knock and a valiant century in the second -- and to a smaller extent Sourav Ganguly, none had the stomach for a fight.
Captain Rahul Dravid had a forgettable match with the bat after having been in supreme form in the first two Tests at Lahore and Faisalabad where he scored back-to-hack hundreds on featherbeds. The Indian skipper just lacked sufficient practice on more helpful wickets in the earlier part of the series to get out to the balls bowled in the corridor of uncertainty.
The cheap dismissals of Dravid, who chose to open the innings in all three Tests, and Virender Sehwag, who never applied himself and tried expansive shots, truly put the visitors on the back foot from which they never recovered.
Sachin Tendulkar and Venkatasai Laxman looked good till both were comprehensively beaten by sharp incoming balls in both the innings while Mahendra Singh Dhoni, at ease and in command when the ball did not do much off the air or pitch, perished on a more helpful pitch.
If the batting flopped in both the innings, the bowling -- after looking devastating in the first hour of the match -- just failed to impress thereafter, lacking in discipline if not effort.
Irfan Pathan gave a sensational start to the match by getting a world record first-over Test hat-trick before being rendered innocuous by the Pakistani batsmen while Zaheer Khan and Rudra Pratap Singh simply paled in comparison to Asif.
Dravid defended his bowlers after the match saying "we could have bowled better, but we could have batted better too." But the fact which emerged was that on a pitch where the ball was darting around alarmingly, the Indian bowlers just could not tighten the noose on the Pakistanis in the first innings after having them on the ropes punch-drunk at none for 3 and then 39 for six.
The Indian seam attack was really exposed in the second innings when the hosts went hammer and tongs at them with the top seven batsmen crossing the 50s, another first in Test cricket, with the young Faisal Iqbal -- drafted into the squad as a cover for the unfit Inzamam-ul Haq -- completing his maiden hundred to boot.
Coach Greg Chappell said after the third day's play -- by which time Pak had raced to 511 for 5 in only 127 overs -- that "there was no seam or swing" for the bowlers. But on the very next day Asif and Razzaq utilised the same wicket conditions to get lot of seam movement to cause another Indian collapse in just over four hours.
It very clearly showed the paucity of ideas in the Indian bowlers' heads and also exposed their lack of pace. In fact, Anil Kumble looked the best Indian bowler on view though the wicket did not suit him at all. The three left-arm pacemen just looked out of sorts in the second essay and the sameness in the way all three bowled made them innocuous.
Pakistan captain Younis Khan said his team's attack definitely had more variety than the Indian pace attack, with a genuine fast bowler in Akhtar to soften up the batsmen for Asif and Razzaq to gobble up with their movement off the pitch at good pace. Dravid admitted after the humiliating 341-run loss that the Indian bowlers "could have hit the deck a bit more to get some more (purchase) out of the wicket."
This statement itself is a big admission about the new ball trio's inabilities, on a wicket that was tailor-made for them, shown up starkly by the score of 599 for seven ran up by the Pakistanis in the second innings which put the match simply out of India's hands.
The Indian pacers' ineffectiveness, in the end, made the crucial difference to the outcome of the match.
