Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article
Home > Cricket > India's tour of West Indies > Column > Michael Holding


'India paid the price for dumping five-bowler theory'

June 16, 2006

I would have thought it hurts India when it is not winning Tests abroad. But if it was so, they would have picked five bowlers for this Test. They have taken two steps backwards from the days in Pakistan when the five-bowler theory was heralded with much fanfare. Now against a weaker bowling attack, they have chosen to strengthen their batting at the cost of bowling. It doesn't make sense.

Irfan Pathan was reintroduced but he is jaded. Both Munaf Patel and V R V Singh were okay but a judgment must wait since they have just embarked on an arduous journey.

I saw merit in Sehwag's effort but Kumble was, well just Kumble. He is a strong individual, a tough cricketer, mentally and physically. He bowled 70 overs in this Test which is not too unusual from a cricketer who came out to bowl with a broken jaw in Antigua the last time he pitched in for his team in 2002.

Still, India is on the rise and these issues are minor when you look at the travails which have engulfed the home team. I am not too critical of the batting for the trinity of Sarwan, Lara and Chanderpaul are good enough to make most international sides. They are only inconsistent which, I guess, still does not help the situation.

It would be easy to judge West Indian batsmen harshly on their technique since so many batsmen have been given out lbw in this series. Sometimes the batsmen have not appeared in the same league while confronting Kumble and at other times, the Indian medium-pacers too have looked in business.

Also Read


Dravid second in ICC rankings

Is the Match Referee against India?

Lara saves WI with fighting ton

Images from day five

Kumble enjoys leading role


But I maintain these guys have made runs against all-comers. These were the men who showed their worth while chasing down 418 runs against Australia not very long ago. I would not call them short of class.

Bowling, in contrast, is in a trough and over 1,100 runs conceded in two innings makes any argument in its defence pointless. I fear West Indies could end up having a new attack in every Test that is played in this series.

It takes time to build combinations and it cannot be produced at the drop of a hat. West Indies would stumble from one set to another in desperation and would be lucky if anything worthwhile is thrown up. The number of players tried in the West Indies cricket set up in recent years is no laughing matter.

Indian batsmen must lick their lips in anticipation at least for St. Kitts as Sabina Park in Jamaica interests bowlers. It brings me back to my original argument that India does not need an extra batsman. The Dhonis, Pathans and Kumbles are a handy presence low in the order. If it means sacrificing a V V S Laxman or a Yuvraj Singh to respond to team's call, so be it. We all have heard about horses for courses.

I have no doubt India would not carry with their foolhardy ways in the next Test. Three centuries in the game in St. Lucia is reason enough for them to shift attention to the area which is holding up their charge.

Rahul Dravid and Mohammad Kaif played fine hands but the one from Sehwag was sumptuous. The batting aficionados must have loved what Sehwag and Brian Lara produced at the start and end of this Test.

Lara stamped his presence on the game with a decisive innings. He saved the day for his team and it made sense for him to come at the number three spot. The best batsman of the team must take the one-drop position for it is pivotal and prepares the pitch for the rest.

If your best man is lower in the order, the ones preceding him can tend to relax. It even works if the best man was to fail at the number three spot. The ones who follow him would then respond to the responsibility.


India's tour of West Indies: The Complete Coverage

Would you like to join the Cricket and Cricket Lovers Discussion Group and discuss your cricket views with other cricket freaks? Click here. Have fun!

© Copyright 2005 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.


Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 6




Sub: i don't understand the logic behind it

i don't understand that how can u win a match with just two pace bowlers !!!!! i wonderr what wrong has agarkar done not tu ...


Posted by ashutosh





Sub: Indian selection

VRV is getting chance because he bowled the luckiest delivery of his career, that hit ganguly on his helmet and it pleased More and Chappell ...


Posted by deb





Sub: Great Cricket By Indians

Is't Mr Holding being a bit too harsh on the Indians(calling their tactics fool hardy) considering the fact that the Indians played GREAT cricket with ...


Posted by jimbly





Sub: The real reason for India losing

The real reason for India losing has been the bizzare selection of VRV Singh. He has never looked like taking wickets and the numbers speak ...


Posted by Ajay





Sub: Michael Holding column

Michael is correct. Had there been either Harbhajan or Irfan in the 1st test, India would have romped home with a grand victory. Rain played ...


Posted by k.mallick




Disclaimer


Advertisement