Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article

Home > Cricket > PTI > Report


Hair would have needed 24-hour protection in India: Speed

October 05, 2006 16:19 IST

The International Cricket Council has said umpire Darrell Hair was withdrawn from the Champions Trophy after it was told that he would be at a "heightened" risk and require 24-hour protection in the wake of the Oval Test controversy.

Chief Executive Malcolm Speed said the ICC had sought an independent security advice after BCCI raised concerns over a "potential negative reaction" from the crowd towards Hair, after which it decided that it was in the best interest of the Australian that he be withdrawn.

"Prior to the hearing we received a letter from the BCCI president, Sharad Pawar, raising his concerns about a potential negative reaction from some followers of the game there and the security implications this may have," Speed said.

"We listened to this view and sought independent security advice which highlighted a heightened risk and the need for 24 hour protection. In the circumstances we decided it was in the best interests of Darrell and the tournament not to send him to the event," he said in a column for Cricinfo.

The ICC CEO also backed Hair to once again officiate in international matches as a member of the Elite umpires' panel.

"His decision-making marks him out as one of the ICC's top officials and I very much hope he will stand again at the highest level," Speed said.

"And in that regard it was pleasing to see comments from both Inzamam-ul Haq and Shaharyar Khan last weekend expressing similar sentiments."

Speed denied that the disciplinary hearing's outcome on the Oval fiasco undermined the authority of umpires. Instead, he said, it underlined that players could not take law into their own hands.

"Cricket must learn from this (the Oval) experience.

"Far from undermining the authority of the umpires, as some have claimed, the hearing maintained it. By banning Inzamam-ul Haq for four matches, Ranjan [Madugalle] confirmed players cannot take the law into their own hands, no matter how wronged they feel. The fact the Pakistan Cricket Board have not appealed the ban is a clear indication it accepts that," he said.

He also admitted that the issue of ball tampering needed "careful consideration" by both MCC, who are responsible for the Laws, and ICC's own cricket committee.

© Copyright 2006 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.

Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 1




Sub: Malcom Speed

ICC is a totally impotent organisation. The way it handled the recent Oval fiasco has exposed its capabilities. If Inzamam has been cleared of ball ...


Posted by mohammed ali




Disclaimer


Advertisement






Copyright © 2006 Rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.