Rediff India Abroad
 Rediff India Abroad Home  |  All the sections

Search:



The Web

India Abroad




Newsletters
Sign up today!

Article Tools
Email this article
Top emailed links
Print this article
Contact the editors
Discuss this article
Home > Movies > Columns

Cannes: Who cares?

Deepa Gahlot | April 30, 2003 16:36 IST

 At this time last year, there was near hysteria in the media at Devdas being invited to the Cannes festival for an out-of-competition screening. This year, there is a big buzz about Aishwarya Rai being on the jury.A still from Arimpara

But we tend to be so Bollywood-centric that real achievements by filmmakers from other parts of the country do not get the same kind of euphoric reception. Last year, Manish Jha's A Very Very Short Film won an award at Cannes, but it was buried under endless stories of red carpets being laid out for Bollywood's stars (Aishwarya Rai and Shah Rukh Khan).

This year, Arimpara (The Story That Begins At The End), a film by Murali Nair, has been selected for screening in the prestigious 'Un Certain Regard' section of Cannes -- the only official Indian entry -- but do we hear much trumpeting in the media? Barring a few very matter-of-fact news reports, there is nothing.

Why? Because Nair's film is in Malayalam; he is not publicity-savvy; the film does not have a star that our mainstream media has heard of -- though Nedumudi Venu is among the finest actors in India today -- and has absolutely no glamour.  The well-read few will note that the film is based on eminent writer O V Vijayan's famous and much-anthologised short story, The Wart. But, obviously, it wouldn't mean anything to the uninitiated.
 
Murali Nair's Marana Simhasanam (The Throne of Death) had won the Camera d'Or award (given to a first-time director) at Cannes in 1999; subsequently, his Patiyudde Divasam (A Dog's Day) was screened in the 'Un Certain Regard' section.
A still from Arimpara
Shaji Karun's Vanaprastham (1999), Swaham (1994) and Piravi (1989) have been screened in this section -- Piravi (Birth) even got a special jury mention. Gautam Ghose's Gudia (1997) and Antarjali Yatra (1998) were screened in this section too. The fact that Mira Nair's Salaam Bombay won the Camera d'Or in 1998, of course, got its share of coverage. But who remembers a little known film from Orissa, Indradhanura Chhai by Susant Misra, being screened in the 'Un Certain Regard' section in 1995?

Satyajit Ray's Ghare Baire was in competition in 1984, the year Mrinal Sen's Khandhar was part of the 'Un Certain Regard' package. Ray's Ganashatru was screened out-of-competition in 1989.

Our media showed very little interest in Cannes till the information and broadcasting ministry began having a big India Pavilion in the market section and took along some Bollywood bigwigs.

Now everybody has woken up to Cannes' potential, but only to the extent of focusing on Bollywood glamour there. Good cinema does not seem to interest anyone. (Lagaan's popular win at the Locarno Film Festival got miles of coverage, but Shaji Karun and Jahnu Barua's films won the top awards there without getting a fraction of the applause at home.)

We may gush over Cannes (like we have started doing over the Oscar's cold nod towards Bollywood), but Cannes selectors give Indian cinema a big ignore. They feel our films are simply not worthy of being in competition, while films from tiny countries without fully developed film industries get selected. Technically, we are substandard and our subjects are 30 years out of date.

Which makes it all the more creditable when our regional cinema gets into Cannes -- at any level.

It always happenMurali Nairs that, when our regional or offbeat cinema has cleared a path, Bollywood lands up to demand a share of the pie. For years, the national awards and the film festival circuit were looked down upon by the commercial industry as fit for the  'arty jholawalas.' The minute some prestige, publicity or money is seen going to the 'other' cinema, the mainstream guys want to muscle in. Now a large percentage of entries for national awards, the Indian Panorama section and film festivals come from the commercial cinema camps. But it is wonderful to see cinemas from other regions holding their ground. 

Still, nobody will be surprised if the colour of Aishwarya Rai's saris will be reported in the media 'back home' more than the response to Murali Nair's film, or any other Indian film, screened in the market.

We just have to learn to separate the wheat from the chaff for ourselves.


Share your comments


 What do you think about the story?




Read what others have to say:


Number of User Comments: 63




Sub: Aha!! Halfdone homework hurts so many feelings

I am not here to share my thoughts about the issue or any other thing. I just noticed that you have developed this *bad* feeling ...


Posted by K K





Sub: Razzle Dazzle helps overcome stresses of life.

Please don't tell me about 'Schindler's list' and 'One who flew over cuckoo's nest'. These are made in USA,. In US,people have access to good ...


Posted by Sharan





Sub: Cliche !!! Irony !!! What is it ???

To start with, I think it's becoming a fashion in the modern indian society to rant abt the unmentioned and undermentioned events. Further, I would ...


Posted by KRK





Sub: author is right

There is no substance in bollywood movies..And when someone says that openly, we people are not ready to accept that.I know a lot of films ...


Posted by binu





Sub: Who Cares huh!!!!

Who cares which film is shown at Cannes. Why make such a fuss about everything. I know Devdas utlimately fell flat at Oscars. So what ...


Posted by Ashish




Disclaimer

Advertisement






Copyright © 2005 Rediff.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved.